All comparisons

IronClaw vs Hermes Agent

Two open-source agents with opposite defaults: IronClaw sandboxes untrusted tools from the first run, Hermes Agent runs commands on the host behind approvals.

Side-by-side

AxisIronClawHermes Agent
SetupRelease installers for macOS, Linux and Windows, then ironclaw onboard: provider, key, WebUI token and the background service.One install script, then hermes setup.
Security modelUntrusted tools run in WebAssembly sandboxes limited to the hosts, paths and credentials they declare. Secrets are encrypted (AES-256-GCM) and injected at the host boundary, with a leak detector. The shell tool is off unless you set ALLOW_LOCAL_TOOLS=true, and then runs on the host.Commands run on the host by default, with approvals for dangerous ones; Docker and cloud sandbox backends are opt-in, and its security policy asks for the whole agent in a container for untrusted input.
Model supportMulti-LLM: NEAR AI by default, Anthropic, OpenAI, GitHub Copilot, Ollama and OpenAI-compatible servers.Multi-LLM: Nous Portal, OpenRouter, Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini and local servers such as Ollama.
CostFree software (MIT or Apache-2.0). Model costs separate.Free software; its README says it runs on a $5 VPS. Model costs separate.
EcosystemWebAssembly tools and channels installed as extensions, plus MCP servers.Skills, plugins and MCP servers.
Best forSetups that want untrusted tools sandboxed and secrets kept away from them from day one.Setups that want broad tools on the host with approvals, and will add a container backend themselves.

Verdict

Same licence family, different starting points. IronClaw starts locked down and asks you to grant tools what they need; Hermes Agent starts open on the host and asks you to add the sandbox. Pick the one whose default matches the input your agent will read.

Notes

  • Until October 2026 this page priced IronClaw at $750 a seat, called it source-available and credited it with gVisor, RBAC, SAML SSO and an air-gap mode. Its repository, read on 2026-10-18, shows an MIT or Apache-2.0 licence and documents none of those.
  • IronClaw's README lists a full audit log of tool executions; Hermes Agent writes logs under ~/.hermes/logs/ with secrets redacted.
  • Both publish security documentation: IronClaw a security page and its README, Hermes Agent its security docs and SECURITY.md.

Sources

Going deeper

For the full landscape report including hosting economics, security posture and regulatory context, see the 2026 landscape report. For the OpenClaw-specific history, see the complete OpenClaw timeline.

New comparison requests are welcome: subscribe and reply to any edition with your short-list.